Websites
Public sites, marketing pages, portals and anything else serving content to visitors.
Home/Web Application Firewall
Application protection
A web application firewall inspects the requests reaching your website, application or API and applies policy before your application is asked to handle them.
What it protects
If it has a URL and accepts input, it is worth protecting at the request level.
Public sites, marketing pages, portals and anything else serving content to visitors.
Logged-in products, dashboards, booking systems and internal tools exposed to the internet.
Endpoints built for machine access, which attract automated traffic by design.
Product pages, carts and checkout flows where the cost of downtime is immediate.
Subscription products, member areas and anything else your customers sign in to.
The paths that attract credential-stuffing and automated abuse before anything else does.
Network firewall vs web application firewall
This is the question we are asked most, so it is worth answering directly rather than in a comparison table nobody reads.
How it works
Requests arriving at your site pass through the WAF first. Each one is evaluated against a rule set tuned to your application: what a valid request looks like, which patterns are associated with known attack techniques, and what should happen to the rest.
Valid traffic continues to the application. Requests that match a block rule are stopped and recorded, so the decision can be reviewed and the rule adjusted if needed.
Request-level protection reduces exposure to common attack patterns. It does not replace secure development practice, patching or sound application design.
FAQ
A network firewall controls the way in and out of a network: addresses, ports, connections and devices. A web application firewall inspects the requests arriving at a website or application — form submissions, API calls, login attempts — and decides which ones the application should be asked to handle. They protect different things and are commonly used together.
HTTPS encrypts traffic in transit, which protects it from being read or altered on the way. It does not assess whether a request is legitimate. A WAF looks at the content of the request itself, which is a separate question.
Yes. APIs are a common target precisely because they are designed for automated access. API endpoints can be protected under the same policy as the rest of the application, with coverage depending on your configuration.
Rules are tuned to your application, and actions are recorded so a decision can be reviewed and adjusted. Some tuning after launch is normal, especially for applications with unusual request patterns.
Web application protection is designed for websites, applications, APIs and online services, including commerce platforms. What is required in your case depends on how your site is hosted and built.
No, and it should not be presented that way. A WAF reduces exposure to common request-level attack patterns; it does not correct flaws in application code. It is a layer, not a substitute.
Next step
Tell us what you run — a website, an application, an API, or all three — and we will explain what request-level protection would cover.